Ap Biology Pill Bug Lab Discussion Essay Example

Ap Biology Pill Bug Lab Discussion Essay Example Ap Biology Pill Bug Lab Discussion Paper Ap Biology Pill Bug Lab Discussion Paper Essay Topic: Discussion This lab felt very â€Å"slow† because there was not a lot of action going on. The pill bugs would either walk around in circles or stay put. However, it was both fun and annoying when my group tried to put the pill bugs in the chamber and take them out. We had to put a lot of effort to get the pill bugs on to the paint brushes because they would scurry around and it would take a while to find them. Also, it was cool to see the pill bugs use their defense mechanism (it only happened once) by going into a hard circular shape when being prodded at by a paintbrush. This lab had a lot of experimental areas. The amount of water or basic or acidic solution to the paper may have affected results. For the first part of the lab, outside factors could have contributed to the results, such as lighting, vibration, or chemical residue. Also, as soon as we put all the pill bugs in the chamber, we started the lab. If we had given five minutes or so for the pill bugs to be attributed to the environment, the results would have changed. For the second part of the lab, the strength of the pH values were a big factor in forming the results, and a change in strength could be a major alteration. In addition, my group did not use the same pill bugs in the second part as we had used in the first part. Different pill bugs would have been subject to different things, and so their learned behaviors may be different, which would change the results. No two animals are the same.

The American-German Relationsh essays

The American-German Relationsh essays 2.1 The First German Settlers in the USA 2.2 The American-German Relationship before and during the Second World War 2.3 New Evaluation of the American-German Relationship after the Second World War 2.4 The Vietnam War and the First Protest Movement in the Sixty Eighties 2.5 The American Contribution to the German Reunification and the Development of the German-American Friendship after the East-West Conflict 2.6 Analysis of the Importance of History for the current Friendship 3 Development of the American-German Relationship during George W. Bushs Term of Office War against Terrorism 3.1 George W. Bush and his New Foreign Policy 3.2 11th September 2001 and the German Unrestricted Solidarity 3.3 The War in Afghanistan and Enduring Freedom 3.4 Different View of the Safety Policy in Germany and the United States 4 Analysis and Appraisal of Opinion-Forming Sources during the American- 4.1 Analysis of the Government Declaration of the Federal Chancellor Gerhard Schrder about the attacks in the United States of America on 12th September 2001 4.2 Analysis of the Essay Power and Weakness by Robert Kagan 5 Public Opinion Poll about the American-German Relations Germany and the United States of America are connected by a vital amity. That amity is based on common experiences and common values. From there it is extremely interesting to investigate how this solid friendship could be shaken somehow. During my stay abroad in Mexico I could follow the third Gulf war and the discussion about its justice and unjustness very intensively. There it was also easier than here in Germany to discuss about the conflict with US Americans. That way I got to know the different political positions, above all of the civic American population. But also by internet I always tried to follow the debate. As a result in my expert work I...

The effect of the phenomenon of separation of ownership and control Essay

The effect of the phenomenon of separation of ownership and control for modern corporations - Essay Example Corporate Governance Share-holder activism in 1990s stimulated interest on corporate governance. In fact, it became a household name in the United States when a California based company â€Å"California Public Employees Retirement System† (CalPERS) questioned the listed companies in which it had invested the funds of its members, for their practice of buying back their shares at higher prices. This literally resulted in reduction the value of shares held by CalPERS. Contemporary companies all over the world including the U.K. followed suit to safeguard the interests of their widely dispersed shareholders. What started as a means of funds mobilization by an entrepreneur for engaging in large scale activities and to achieving large scale economies, soon became handy for the entrepreneur to exploit the small and widely dispersed investors.1 In the 19th century, even the privately owned large companies who had accumulated wealth overtime had to resort to procurement of funds from the capital market as they had outgrown themselves. Agency theory that explains separation of ownership from control was first discussed by Adolf A Beale and Gardiner C Means2. One can still go backwards to the times Adam Smith who in his â€Å"The Wealth of Nations† 3 has said that company directors would not care for shareholders’ money as their own and this is the problem with agency theory as observed by Letza, Sun and Kirkbride.4 Fame and Jensen 5 argue that separation of decision making (control) and risk-bearing (ownership) become viable because of the need for specialization of management and risk bearing besides the need for controlling agency problems. They cite the nature of an organization as a nexus of contracts both written and oral among the owners of factors of production and customers which are the internal â€Å"rules of the game†. The rights of owners of each factor of production and customers are specified and their performances evaluated. Th ese factors of production are rather stake-holders in the organization. The authors assert survival of a form of an organization depends on its ability to sell their output required by their customers at the lowest price while at the same time fully recovering costs. There are two types of organizations wherein risk-bearing (ownership) and decision (control) functions are separated and wherein the two functions are combined in the same agents. In the contractual nature of organizational forms, the residual claimants are the residual risk bearers having claim over the net cash flows after meeting the contracted payments to the factors of production from out of stochastic inflows of resources. Thus, residual risk is known by the â€Å"difference between stochastic inflows of resources and promised payments to agents.†6 These residual claimants are the ones who bear the most uncertainty and it is considered worthwhile as it reduces costs of monitoring contracts with the rest of the agents. This contributes to the survival value of the organizations as distinct entities. It is mandatory to produce outputs at lesser costs so as to ensure increased net cash flows to safeguard the residual claimants’ interests. Restriction on residual claims differs from each form of organization. For example, large corporations where common stocks are in use have the least restricted residual claims. That is, the shareholders have no role to play in the organizations. Because of this, risk sharing is unrestricted for the